Automatic    - No interrogation

Dependent    - $Billions for TIS ground equipment

Surveillance - See aircraft around yours

Broadcast    - "collapsible" data network protocol

 

Link & display processor box  ~ 4" x 8" x 11" @ 4 pounds +

Display (CDTI) panel mount +

GPS panel mount +                                   present price ~$300,000

Transponder (you probably have a P4 AD in your future)  additional cost

 

2 velocity   + tail number packets/second

2 position   + tail number packets/second

1 identity   + tail number packet /second

1 intentions + tail number packet /5seconds            5.2 packets/second

                                                      Minimum mode (no TIS)

 

NAS capacity ~300 aircraft within ~80 nautical miles     Mitre analysis

 

ATCRBS compatibility issue (TIS 300 ATCRBS 250 ADS-B)  75,000 added packets

                                                     (assume 1 packet warn)

 

Design Objective:

Just only three airports in one valley, doing 175 landings/hr peak at

the busiest, in the middle of the night, in the middle of nowhere,

between those aircraft that can afford the equipment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Automatic    - No interrogation

Independent  - No ground equipment & no operators & no FAA

Surveillance - See aircraft around yours

Packet       - "collapsible" data network but 100x to 1000x NAS capacity

 

ATCRBS transponder mod (FAA AD compliance)         probable price ~$    500

   That is all you need to be 1090 mode S compatible & AIS-P visible

 

If you want a traffic advisory in your cockpit

   Traffic informer (AIS-P prox detector)          probable price ~$  2,500

 

1 (velocity + position - tail number) packet/second   1.0 packets/second

 

NAS capacity (AIS-P = ?x ADS-B)                        min x100 of ADS-B

 

ATCRBS compatibility issue (TIS 300 ATCRBS 250 AIS-P)   300 added packets

 

Design Objective:

all airspace, including doing 175 landings/hr peak at the busiest,

all of the time, all aircraft.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same

     Same conflict detection at same greater range

     Same collision avoidance at same ground up

     Same extension of separation assurance

     Same collision avoidance possibility for GA

     Same enable means to prevent runway incursions

     Same every collision avoidance objective to acceptable limits

 

Difference - what Peshak threw out of ADS-B to get to AIS-P

     - weather      (use your radar, storm scope, satellite internet pager)

     - parallel ILS (use your localizer and glide slope)

     - ability for UPS to know where all its planes are

     - squawk tail number

     - all of the ancillary packets (put all information needed in one)

 

Difference + what Peshak added to AIS-P that ADS-B cannot do

     + 100x NAS capacity (allows more airplanes before link failure)

     + target equipage for free

     + 20% of full up cost (~$2.5k vs $12.5k (target) for advisory)

+ single panel mount box (got rid of 4"x8"x11" 4 pound box)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is needed to complete AIS-P releasable hardware now

     Mode S Downlink Format Number (DF#)

          to be assigned by ICAO (John Mark Loscos 514-954-6713)

              32 packets possible, several remain undefined & un-used

          for packet definition published at:

http://www.gtwn.net/~keith.peshak/Keith_ais.htm

          to allow compatibility with all mode S equipments

              no interference to any existing or envisioned equipments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FAA History

     Microwave Landing System

     Refusal to certify proven CAT IIIc equipment

     Mode S transponder

     TCAS (brought "Los Angeles Basin" problem to everywhere)

     GPS Sole Use Navigation

 

Do you want the FAA to define the future of Collision Avoidance?