BLAIR KEITH PESHAK
&
SMALL CLAIMS COURT
&
V
&
PRECINCT 3
&
&
WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS
DON HUGHES AND NATIONWIDE
&
INSURANCE COMPANY
RELEASE AND SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
STATE OF TEXAS
&
WILLIAMSON COUNTY
&
Whereas, on the 12th day of September, 2001, in the
Small Claims Court, Precinct Three, Williamson County, Texas, in Cause
No. SC 2001-018, Plaintiff, BLAIR KEITH PESHAK, recovered judgment against
Defendants, DON HUGHES and NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, for the sum of
$3,357.27 together with post-judgment interest in the amount of $37.00,
for a total award of $3,394.27. Plaintiff, BLAIR KEITH PESHAK, acknowledges
payment of such judgment by NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY on behalf of Defendants
DON HUGHES and NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, and Plaintiff hereby agrees
to release Defendants, DON HUGHES and NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, their
heirs and assigns, THEIR ATTORNEYS, and THEIR
INSURER of all liens hereto existing by reason of such judgment
or ANY OTHER LIENS arising out of this case.
Plaintiff, BLAIR KEITH PESHAK, further affirms that
the judgment rendered by the jury in the above cause number has been fully
and completely satisfied by payment of the judgment and further
CONFIRMS
THAT THERE ARE NO OUTSTANDING PAYMENTS OR OTHER LIENS AGAINST PLAINTIFF
arising out of the incident made the basis of this lawsuit.
Plaintiff, BLAIR KEITH PESHAK, further confirms,
warrants, and represents that the judgment in the above-entitled cause
of action has been FULLY SATISFIED BY PAYMENT OF
$3,357.27 together with post-judgment interest in the amount of
$37.00, for a total award of $3,394.27, and Plaintiff, BLAIR KEITH PESHAK,
agrees and confirms that NO EXECUTION SHALL ISSUE
on this Judgment. Plaintiff further confirms that Defendants, DON
HUGHES and NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, are RELEASED
FROM ANY FURTHER LIABILITY in conjunction with the above-referenced
lawsuit.
Done at Georgetown, Williamson County, Texas this
______day of________, 2001
(no signature)
______________________________________
BLAIR KEITH PESHAK
Before me, the undersigned notary public in and for
said state, on this day personally appeared BLAIR KEITH PESHAK known to
me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument,
who acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration
therein expressed.
Given under my hand and seal of office this the
________day of______, 2001
(no signature)
______________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND
FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
Why should I release their attorneys, if their attorneys had been dishonest
and/or deceitful?
Why should I release their insurer, if I prevail in proving dishonest
and deceitful?
Why should I release how would I know if there are (must be) other
liens?
Why should I release for a lesser amount than my actual proven insured
out of pocket loss (money I must pay)?
Why should I release the execution of the judgment for no negotiable
instrument in hand?
Why should I release the Defendants from their liability to the state?
Maybe, just maybe, the State Insurance Commission
will do something.
If I remember correctly, ANDREA SARGENT-FAMBLES said something to the
judge like:
"If Mr. Peshak doesn't sign this release, then he
gets no checks."
Why shouldn't I find out is there any value to this court?